User Activity Explorer
Explore Reddit user activity chronologically with interactive annotations
Stratified examples:
Loading...
Enter your credentials to start annotating
Annotator accounts are pre-provisioned with generated credentials.
Admin login: username "admin", password "admin".
Monitor annotator activity and progress
Loading statistics...
Explore Reddit user activity chronologically with interactive annotations
Thank you for joining this study as a data annotator. This short guide follows the Annotation Protocol and walks you through using the web application for this study.
Your login information is generated automatically. Please check your email for your login and password.
Choose a user from the suggested list. The order is optional. Every user is highlighted in blue if completed, and in yellow if not finished.
Go through each post and highlight any part of the post that you think demonstrates disordered eating behavior, according to EDE-Q. For example, if a user shares eating big portions, ask: which EDE-Q item does it resemble most, and to what degree (mild concern vs. big concern)?
If you do not mark a phrase, we assume it is a safe statement — no disordered eating behavior is present. When you do mark a phrase, choose one of two severities:
After you have finished annotating the whole user, open the Rating Tool and rate what kind of risky behavior they show (1–5) and how confident you are. You will then rank the top three EDE-Q questions that, if present, would increase the risk level.
Use these anchors when choosing a score (draft — subject to change during final testing):
| 1 | No concerning behavior present. |
|---|---|
| 2 | Mild/isolated concern; unlikely significant alone. |
| 3 | Moderate concern; a pattern worth attention. |
| 4 | Clear, concerning pattern; likely warrants follow-up. |
| 5 | Severe/urgent; explicit high-risk indicators present. |
| 1 | Guessing — highly uncertain. |
|---|---|
| 2 | Low confidence — could easily be wrong. |
| 3 | Moderate confidence. |
| 4 | Fairly confident. |
| 5 | Very confident — clear, unambiguous evidence. |
When you finish your first user, continue annotating users 2 through 5 until you complete the full batch.
Quick background on terms that sometimes appear in posts about diets or weight-management programs (for example, Weight Watchers). This is only to help you read the text— it does not change how you apply the annotation protocol.
This text reflects the current study protocol document. If instructions from the research team differ, follow those.